| Press
Room

Managing
The Virtual Office
by Frank S. Washington
In a five-year span, Turner Consulting Group’s income
grew almost ten-fold. The company, which provides information
technology, management services and consulting to the federal
government, commercial enterprises and to non-profit organizations,
saw its revenue increase dramatically. During its 10-year
existence, Turner has hired 25 people. But other than CEO
Dan Turner and a manager who sometimes works out of a Washington,
D.C. office, the rest of Turner’s employees work from
home.
Turner Consulting Group is one of a growing number of virtual
companies. In other words, Turner is a business enterprise
with little or no office space and employees who work at home.
It is difficult to pinpoint how many virtual enterprises there
are, but the number of Americans who performed any kind of
work from home (for as little as one day per year to full
time) grew from 41.3 million people in 2003 to 44.4 million
in 2004, a 7.5 percent increase, according to the 2004 American
Interactive Consumer Survey. The same survey found that eight
million of them are full-time employees of either virtual
companies or traditional corporations.
The primary reason for the growth in full-time virtual employment
is cost cutting. Employers can save from $5,000 to $10,000
per virtual employee through reduced absenteeism and reduced
costs. However, there are reasons other than saving money
why companies use virtual employees. The talent pool broadens
and deepens because virtual employees can be hired and work
from anywhere. The lack of commute times improves productivity
and it helps the environment. And an organization with virtual
employees is more agile, fluid and more responsive to market
conditions.
Virtual enterprise can be applied to just about any sector
of the economy. The obvious ones are service industries such
accounting, communications and consulting. But certain aspects
of any business, whether it’s fashion or manufacturing,
can be transformed into virtual departments.
David Cassidy, a spokesman for Turner Consulting Group, says
there are three challenges for virtual organizations to overcome.
First is providing the infrastructure to allow virtual employees
to do their jobs. Second is establishing policies and procedures
by which every employee’s work can be collated. Third,
and most important, is managing a virtual organization.
Most companies manage the method by observation. They give
a task and then manage the way it is achieved. “That
isn’t how we manage,” Cassidy says. “The
better way to manage is managing by objective. Give folks
a task to do and don’t manage the execution of that
task, but manage its completion. Our clients are all aware
that we manage by objective as opposed to managing by head
count.”
A recent study published in the Harvard Business Review found
that “far flung” teams outperformed teams whose
members worked side by side. The researchers who conducted
the study found that the “far flung” teams succeeded
by practicing three principles:
• They exploited their diversity, challenging people
from different disciplines, cultures, and the like to come
up with something better together.
• They used technology to simulate reality. More than
80 percent of the teams use teleconference calls and shared
websites. More than half used instant messaging even when
their companies prohibited it.
• And they communicated. Some team leaders spent as
much as a third of their time on the phone with team members.
Some companies compensate their virtual employees for the
space used to create offices at home; others do not. Other
companies mandate that the home offices are in separate rooms
with doors that shut and dedicated phone lines.
But there are some generalities. Virtual employers provide
desktop computers, laptops (if needed), faxes, cell phones,
and dedicated phone lines, and they will pick up the tab for
some furniture. When dedicated lines are not provided, companies
will reimburse their virtual employees for their phone bills.
Broadband Internet connections are provided and virtual companies
are utilizing VoIP (Internet phone service). The high-speed
technology lets virtual companies set up internal networks.
Just dial an extension and talk to a virtual co-worker across
the country or across the street.
Jean Halliday was a full-time virtual employee in Detroit
for only 16 months. Ad Week magazine provided her with a desktop
computer and a fax machine in her home. She paid the phone
bill and was reimbursed.
Halliday had to check in with the main office in New York.
But she liked working from home so much that she negotiated
the right to work from home two days a week in her current
job.
“The thing I really liked about it was there was no
commuting to an office,” Halliday says. “They
were closing parts of I-75 for two summers in row; it was
just a hassle. At home you walk down the hall and you’re
ready to work. You do have to be self-motivated; I feel like
I was. You get it done. In a way, you get more done because
you’re not all frazzled when you get to work from the
commute.”
David Kiley worked from his home for four years as USA Today’s
Detroit bureau chief. Not only did he always rank near the
top of the business section in byline counts, but he wrote
two books and never took a leave of absence. “I could
never have done that in this job,” he says. Kiley is
the marketing editor at BusinessWeek and his daily commute
to his New York office is 1.5 hours each way.
During his stint as a virtual employee, Kiley felt disconnected
from the “mother ship.” He says there were plenty
of times that he missed the socialization of the work place.
Over time, however, he became a home office worker straight
out of central casting, working in his pajamas well into the
afternoon. “That sort of freedom and informality you
can get used to,” he says. “There’s no oversight
or supervision.”
Just as important as the equipment, policies and procedures
of virtual companies are the processes they use to hire virtual
employees. Everybody doesn’t work well from home.
Candidates for the Virtual World
Obviously, the best virtual employees are independent self-starters
who don’t need constant supervision. But there’s
more. Virtual employees must embrace and be comfortable enough
with technology so as to create a virtual community workspace
through e-mail, instant messaging, phone and faxes. And a
company should stay in constant contact with its virtual employees,
lest they become disconnected from the enterprise.
Turner Consulting Group looks for self-directed, communicative
people who want to use the tools that let them communicate
— telephones, instant messaging, e-mail, or whatever
it might be.
But they also seek individuals with an “excessive amount”
of innate responsibility. In other words, Turner wants people
who will take responsibility for tasks and ensure that those
tasks are executed properly.
“Most people get a huge chunk of their social network
from work,” Cassidy says. “We want people who
already have other ways of establishing their social network
because they’re not going to get it by walking into
their office everyday. So we look for folks who take classes,
have large family gatherings … who basically demonstrate
to us that they’re not going to sit themselves in an
office and do nothing else.
We very strongly believe that external stimulus into everyone’s
life is a great way of creating creativity. If you don’t
have that, you’re missing out on something.”
The federal government is committed to converting a large
portion of its employees into virtual workers. Studies have
found that AT&T’s virtual employees work five more
hours per week than the company’s office workers.
JD Edwards’ virtual workers are 20 to 25 percent more
productive than its office workers. Plus, research has found
that a 40-minute commute equals eight working weeks every
year.
If it weren’t apparent, such statistics certainly bear
out that virtual enterprises are the best and most cost efficient
way to get some jobs done. ?
|